Dating techniques dvd
Later, this date was confirmed by two other dating methods (paleomagnetism and fission tracks), and was widely accepted.Then Richard Leakey found a skull (called KNM-ER 1470) the KBS tuff, a skull that looked far too modern to be 3 million years old.but combining several dating methods with fossils and evo-devo approach should give one an acceptably accurate idea of when something existed - at least the order of magnitude would be trustworthy (look at the example they gave underneath... Further, comparing results based on one set of assumptions with results based on another set of assumptions does not make the results objective.It just says that the assumptions are using the same beliefs.And while we call the assumptions behind the long-age evolutionary creation myth into question, we also provide an alternative.We point to biblical history as reliable and accurate, and we do our science within that framework.
"Scientific dating is not a way of measuring but a way of thinking." Science is a way of thinking and of course does require assumptions.Which illustrates that, contrary to popular belief, the dating methods are not the primary way that ages are decided. Their results are always ‘interpreted’ to agree with other factors, such as the evolutionary interpretation of geology and fossils.The ‘new atheists’ claim that Christianity doesn’t have answers to evolution.It's like asking to identify an atheist who argues for the existence of God.That said, there is much evicence that non-Christian scientists report that contradict the idea of long ages, althought they would not see it that way.
There is no 'scientific' method that could give us that knowledge.